Karen’s PR & Social Media Blog

See it! —– Believe it! —– Deal with it!   

March 23, 2012

UPDATES in social media and pr for 23rd march 2012

Discovering Psychology - the Science of Mind by John Cacioppo and Laura Freberg

My mother standing in front of her new textbook: Discovering Psychology - the Science of Mind by John Cacioppo and Laura Freberg. In PR, you might know John from the ELM theory (Elaboration Likelihood Model) a powerful theory of persuasion! CONGRATULATIONS John and Mom!

Here is what I am reading today:

(INFOGRAPHIC!)

“Understanding and measuring influence has vexed social media communicators for years.

Two good places to start would be the release yesterday of Brian Solis/Altimeter’s “how to” guide, The Rise of Digital Influence, and attending today’s panel debate (22 March 2012) at the Guardian’s Changing Media Summit, featuring Leo Ryan (group head of social at Ogilvy), Andrew Grill (UK CEO of Kred), Bonin Bough (global head of digital at Kraft), Philip Sheldrake (Author – The Business of Influence), and Joanna Geary (digital development editor at Guardian News and Media). If you’re not there you can follow the Twitter stream at #cms2012.”

“You might say that we’re in the golden age of infographics.

They’re everywhere, arranging humdrum facts to show connections we didn’t know existed. We share them like crazy, and that makes infographics powerful online marketing tools—if they’re designed properly.

And therein lies the rub: So many infographics get it wrong. But if you know the underlying principles that help shape the truly good ones, you’ll have a better handle on infographics design and how to build a visual winner from the ground up.”

Exploring the issue of digital influence: Great research + report for PR researchers and practitioners

Digital influence is a key topic for many public relations professionals and researchers to explore in their business practices and how it impacts the level of credibility, trustworthiness, and perception of the client among key stakeholders.

Brian Solis recently published his report for Altimeter about this very subject and came away with some interesting pillars and variables to consider when looking at digital influence.  Some of the variables include resonance, reach, and relevance.  Within each of these three pillars of digital influence are several subcategory variables that are associated with the conceptualization of these main categories.

This is very useful to see how Solis and his team are defining each of these terms and the possibilities to use these in research projects.  In addition, the review of case studies and list of measurement tools for influence given near the end of the report is very helpful – especially for researchers and professors who are discussing social media in the classroom – definitely great resources here.  You can download the paper directly from Slideshare.

I believe that Solis and the fellow professionals and researchers who were part of this report were right on when it comes to the understanding of how digital influence is about having a similar connection with their audiences.  It would be interesting to explore if influence is indeed different if it is appearing across platforms and is there a universal formula or a set of best practices to initiate a comprehensive digital influence among audiences.  In addition, most of these conversations and discussions we are seeing with influence on social media are among corporations and brands.  What about other entities like agencies?  Does this also apply with individuals as well?  I would be interested in exploring this and determining if this is truly the case. :)

In addition, the report also acknowledges some of the growing issues with measuring influence with sites like Klout, PeerIndex, and other services is definitely a point for brands, companies, and researchers to take into consideration.  What is the difference between a Klout Score and one that appears on TweetLevel from Edelman?

Along with measuring influence – we have to take into consideration the different perceptions of what constitutes as being influential not only by the content, but also by the personality characteristics that are associated with the source of the information, the media channel being used, and the influence of culture and language into the equation.  Last point – we have to also look at the context of the situation being looked at when it comes to influence.  Is it for the long term or for how a brand deals with a crisis?  We need to further explore how influence is determined not just from positive scenarios, but we have an opportunity to test to see if there are certain fine tuned situations that need to be explored related to other potential situations like a crisis, natural disaster, and emergency to name a few.

In summary, the issue of digital influence will continue to be researched and discussed in both the professional and academic world.  Solis and the team from Altimeter have shared a very comprehensive report on the issue to stimulate this topic in these various circles while also providing a wealth of information and resources.

As technology grows, some things will continue to be the same, but some behaviors and perceptions may evolve. We just have to wait and see what happens next.

Hope you all are having a great day.

Best Wishes,

Karen

 


SINCE 1995

Words to Live by:


"Train hard, win easy!"

Toby Tanser and
John Manners

Karen's Being Social Media Page

Karen's Louisville Page

University of West Virginia's IMC Teacher of the Year!


Managing your on-line Reputation

QR-Code for my C.V.


the Crisis & Social Media Daily


My Recipes

Laura Freberg's Psychology Textbooks

Powered by Word Press